![dirac live vs rew dirac live vs rew](https://www.techpowerup.com/review/meze-99-neo-headphones/images/spectrogram.jpg)
I put 1/12th smoothing on the measurements as I wanted to keep a lot of the resolution for the comparison, but likely for real life one could use 1/6th or psychoacoustic smoothing. Measurements = Using the Umic-1 and REW and the moving mic method for the overall frequency response. Je voulais rester en tout numérique jusquau DAC de mon ampli. Not sure that the Dirac version would affect localization. Listening distance ~10ft from each speaker. MiniDSP SHD et DiracLive transforment lécoute Jutilise Dirac Live 3.0.9 avec MiniDSP SHD studio pour corriger des 'trous' dans les basses fréquences bien visibles avec REW et liés à la pièce. The latest version of Dirac Live Bass Control has indeed fixed the issues that were present in the earlier version. Given the measurement and target curve, Dirac applied. Below that, both show a bass hump and mid bass dip, although to a lesser degree with REW. The Dirac and REW measurements are completely out-of-sync above 400 Hz.
Dirac live vs rew full#
There are other pre pros available with Dirac but they are way too expensive (> 5000) BTW, you can download Dirac Live full for PC or Mac and try it for 30 days. Of course, the last two involve to get rid of your Marantz 7010. Above 1 kHz, the correction ranged from 0 to about 5 dB. Then there is the Emotiva XMC-1 and the NAD 758 V3 receiver. One key technology at play is called Dirac Unison, which the company says is one of its most advanced signal processing methods. There is a mid-bass boost of 5 to 10 dB between 100 Hz and 300 Hz. Speakers at appropriate equilateral triangle. Dirac says that its new Dirac Live automotive solution optimizes the impulse responses and magnitude frequency responses of a whole car audio system, delivering a pristine, natural sound. Receiver = Marantz SR7002 which has Audyssey Multi EQ From what i gather Dirac is a bit better and much easier to use, but also obviously kind of expensive. Yes I realize I run my subs a little high. I plan to compare the two methods using the 14day Dirac trial. Running off a Behringer NX6000D which I have already optimized the time delays and phases and EQed the subs already. Subs = Two 18” Mach5 IXL-18 subs in VBSS enclosures tuned to ~20hz I believe. L&R speakers = HTM-12 v2 (Erins Audio Corner should have kippel ‘better than anechoic’ measurements up in the next while of the HTM-12 version 2) I am not someone who is a validated trained listener, but I will also give a brief subjective opinion. Even tried zeroing out everything on slot 1 and 2 and it shows the right side louder with and without Dirac live on. I ended up copying everything to slot 3 and that fixed it. I have always been interested in comparing the results of equalizing my speakers using REW, Audyssey, and Dirac and taking objective measurements for the comparison. I had it on preset 1 after running Dirac then thought well Ill copy preset 1 to slot 2 and put the Dirac tune on slot 2.